[rtg] Fwd: Results with RTG

John Von Essen john at quonix.net
Mon Mar 9 17:24:32 EDT 2009


Sorry.

Though we are all on the RTG list, so in some way, we have a an  
admiration towards SNMP interface stats when properly collected... Go  
RTG!

My only RTG problem of late is dealing with historical data -  
currently my fix is a faster server or just delete data after 18 months.

-john


On Mar 9, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009, Brandon Ewing wrote:
>
>> IIRC, it's not the collection that kills a Sup, it's the  
>> exporting.  With
>> 6500s, it's a dance between TCAM (storing flows til expiry) and CPU
>> (exporting expired flows).  "Sampling" on a 6500 is sampling the  
>> flow table
>> at expiration time (all flows are still tracked in TCAM according to
>> flowmask) -- it's GSR's that pick random packets to build flows when
>> sampling.
>>
>> Are we off-topic yet?
>
> Yup. :)
>
> So being back on track, if people have a problem with there being  
> no "release",
> then I can do up a release of the stuff I ported over to the  
> subversion repository.
> The thing is, it'll be hackish, and probably won't build and be  
> useful out of
> the box.
>
> I'd love some assistance in making the stuff in the google code SVN  
> repository
> "build usefully", including whatever wiki pages can document how  
> people use it.
>
> 2c, and back to other things I go..
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTG mailing list
> RTG at lists.grdata.com
> http://lists.grdata.com/mailman/listinfo/rtg



More information about the RTG mailing list