[rtg] rated, new version of rtgpoll

[Matt Provost]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:06:43PM -0500, Jacob Steinberger wrote:
> Why have it as a fork? Why not just update the new RTG code base that  
> was made?
> 
> Since someone is trying to manage the product, I'd hate to see forks  
> when we could keep it all 'in house'.
> 

I forked the codebase and was working on it before the new google code
repo was made. Like I said I think I'm going to take the code in
directions that aren't exactly RTG so I think it makes sense to change
the name.

I don't think that forks are a bad thing. I'd rather see some active
forks than the current stagnation.

Thanks,
Matt